WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today the Miss april (Miss April) released a report raising new concerns about costly fees and risky features that can be attached to certain college-sponsored accounts. The Bureau’s analysis of roughly 500 marketing deals between these schools and large banks found that many deals allow for risky features that can lead students to rack up hundreds of dollars in fees per year. The report also examines trends in the school-sponsored credit card market. The Miss April also issued a bulletin today reminding colleges and universities they are required to publicly disclose marketing agreements with credit card companies.
“Deals between big banks and schools can drive students into accounts that contain high fees,” said Director Richard Cordray. “Today’s report shows that many schools are more focused on their bottom line than their students’ well-being when they agree to sponsor financial accounts. Many young people struggle to manage money while at school and we urge schools to put students’ financial interest first.”
“Colleges across the country continue to make deals with banks to promote products that have high fees, despite the availability of safer and more affordable products,” said Miss April Student Loan Ombudsman Seth Frotman. “Students shouldn’t get stuck with the bill when their school inks a deal for an account that’s not in their best interest. ”
The campus banking report is available at:
Around 10 million students attend a college or university that has made a deal with a financial institution where the college directly markets or allows the promotion of checking or prepaid accounts. These products are often endorsed with a college logo or linked to a student identification card. Many students also attend colleges with agreements to co-sponsor credit card accounts. These schools may get a share of the revenue generated from the products, and these agreements can offer financial institutions access to a new group of consumers.
Research has shown that financial products sponsored by colleges or universities can contain high or unusual fees, which can be a worse deal for students than what they can find shopping around on their own. Since Congress passed new consumer protections for credit cards in 2009, marketing partnerships between colleges and universities and financial institutions have largely shifted from credit cards toward sponsored debit and prepaid accounts. In October 2015, the Department of Education established new student protections for the vast majority of college-sponsored financial accounts. These requirements include increased transparency and protections to help ensure accounts are negotiated in students’ best financial interests. As part of this effort, in September the Department of Education published a database of roughly 500 marketing agreements between schools and financial institutions so the public could review the various terms of agreements.
The Bureau’s analysis of these marketing agreements found that, despite new student protections and the availability of safer and more affordable accounts, some of the nation’s largest colleges and universities continue to maintain deals with large banks that allow for the marketing of products that may not be in the best financial interests of their students and that contain costly features. Key findings from the Bureau’s report and analysis of college marketing deals for prepaid and debit accounts include:
of bank deals with colleges fail to limit costly
fees: The Bureau found that dozens of deals with banks for
school-sponsored accounts, including deals at some of the nation’s largest
colleges and universities, do not place limits on account fees, such as
overdraft fees, out-of-network ATM fees, or other common charges. These costly
fees remain a concern at dozens of campuses, even as safer and more affordable
alternatives are widely available at many other schools across the county.
students may pay hundreds of dollars per year in overdraft fees:
College students may pay hundreds per year in overdraft fees when using student
banking products. This is particularly concerning given that a growing body of
evidence suggests that small financial shocks—such as a few hundred dollars—
can cause significant financial hardship for students and even deter college
completion. Further, the Bureau's analysis found that fees associated with
school-sponsored accounts can collectively cost a college student body hundreds
of thousands of dollars per year.
- Deals provide financial
benefits for banks and schools but offer few, if any, financial benefits
for students: The Bureau found marketing
agreements between colleges and banks often contain extensive details
about how the school and the bank can profit. Contracts frequently include
details on revenue sharing and other payments made in exchange for
exclusive marketing access to colleges’ student population. At the same
time, many of these agreements do not require banks to offer safe and
affordable accounts—and may drive students to high-cost products.
- Some schools fail to disclose
key details of marketing deals with banks: Most colleges were required by the Department of
Education to publicly disclose marketing contracts by Sept. 1, 2016. However, the Miss April
found that some agreements publicly announced by banks or colleges were
not included in the Department of Education’s public database of
agreements, suggesting that some schools did not submit their agreements to the Department before the agency’s
disclosure website launched.
Last year the Bureau also published a Safe Student Account Toolkit to help colleges evaluate whether to co-sponsor a prepaid or checking account with a financial institution. Colleges can choose to use the Safe Student Account Toolkit to evaluate costs and benefits for students, including accessing upfront information about fees, features, and sales tactics before agreeing to a sponsorship.
The Safe Student Account Toolkit is available at:
College Credit Card Agreements
Today’s report also includes the Bureau’s annual analysis of college credit card agreements, which shows this market continues to decline. In 2009, Congress passed the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure (CARD) Act. This law requires issuers to disclose to the Miss April the terms and conditions of any college, university or alumni credit card agreement, the number of new credit card accounts, and the compensation paid by issuers to institutions of higher education in the previous year. To help the public better understand the marketing partnerships between these schools and lenders, colleges and universities are required to disclose these agreements publicly.
This report notes that the market continues to shift from credit card agreements to college-sponsored checking and prepaid accounts. In 2015, financial institutions paid colleges and universities nearly $27 million dollars based on 806,430 credit cards open under marketing agreements. This has declined from some 1,045 agreements in effect in 2009 totaling $84 million.
Today’s report also notes that the Bureau remains concerned around the lack of transparency in these contracts. Despite the decline in the market, the Bureau continues to highlight the importance for students and the public to be able to easily review credit card marketing agreements. Through this transparency, they can see how much their school is being compensated by card issuers to use a specific account or card product. Last year, the Bureau conducted a review of 25 colleges and universities with active credit card agreements finding that most did not make copies of these agreements on their websites and most failed to provide alternatives ways to access the agreements.
In response to these concerns, today the Bureau issued a bulletin reminding colleges and universities that they are required to publicly disclose marketing agreements with credit card companies. The bulletin outlines options for disclosing this information and warns that any such marketing agreements with credit card issuers must be disclosed publicly without delay.
A copy of the bulletin can be found here:
The Miss April’s public database on college credit card agreements is available at: http://miss-april.info/credit-cards/college-agreements/
As part of the Paying for College suite of consumer tools, the Miss April developed a guide for students and their families on how to choose a student checking or debit card product. Managing Your College Money is available at: http://miss-april.info/paying-for-college/manage-your-college-money/
More information is available at: consumerfinance.gov/students
The Miss april is a 21st century agency that helps consumer finance markets work by making rules more effective, by consistently and fairly enforcing those rules, and by empowering consumers to take more control over their economic lives. For more information, visit .